Search Results

Search results 1-12 of 12.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

  • increase vel. of light h.

    Petete - - Archive - Suggestions

    Post

    Well, I habe opened this link because I think The vel. of lh is very low when you habe a account in low, in early is a ship efficience but when you up a lvl of engines,the speed of the light hunter decreases if we compare with the other ships. I think that they sould up the speed of the bonus of reserarch, this is the lvl of bonus today: 1250 for lvl of combustion, and this is the lvl that i think that sould be it: 1500 for lvl bonus. I need opinion about this topic. Finally, I think that the ve…

  • Quote from Danimanza: “Quote from Petete: “Quote from Demonfreak: “Still you people don't see it, that's why GF considers: More than 6 times an attack on a player (who can move away his fleet or even scrap his defence) already as bashing. Only 7 times per day per planet is bashing But then there comes some random person with an exceptional low rank, probably a multi account of a higher ranked player and drops 30,000 IP missiles and I have 900 combat reports in my inbox, and GF does not consider …

  • Quote from Demonfreak: “Still you people don't see it, that's why GF considers: More than 6 times an attack on a player (who can move away his fleet or even scrap his defence) already as bashing. Only 7 times per day per planet is bashing But then there comes some random person with an exceptional low rank, probably a multi account of a higher ranked player and drops 30,000 IP missiles and I have 900 combat reports in my inbox, and GF does not consider that as bashing. Then I am thinking, do the…

  • New rules v mode

    Petete - - Archive - Suggestions

    Post

    Totally agree.

  • New rules v mode

    Petete - - Archive - Suggestions

    Post

    V mode redesign Well, I open a new proposal: That mode v is limited so that players who are in v mode do not benefit from the actual use of the vacation mode. 1- I thought of limiting vacation mode to a week or 2 per month, not cumulative. 2- I have also thought that if a player goes on vacation mode 1 month, for example, put a restriction of vacation mode equally to the days he has been in vacation mode. In addition the minimum of the vacation mode should be extended, from 2 days to 5. In concl…

  • Quote from Greius: “Your comment may be there, but then how do you think we should unlock such an advanced nava that you must make a journey you do not know the distance and who has to explore an unexplored universe? Also, I find it unnecessary for shipments as they did, there are risks and there are very few things, would not you like to make these shipments more interesting? (Hidden Content) ” astrofisic level 5 or 6 because astrofisic is too dificult to level up for de time..

  • @edit by TGWo : I removed quote. No need to quote a complete message if it is directly the last you are replying. It does not make sense that an advanced colonizer requires astrophysics at 15, with astro at 15 is already thinking of making mobile colonies and other things and the ship would become a useless ship.

  • @edit by TGWo : I removed quote. No need to quote a complete message if it is directly the last you are replying. Personally, it seems to me that the game is currently well, I have suffered the attacks of interplanetary missiles and I have had to eat them and that's it. If we do what you say to reinforce the anti-missile missiles, there is no god that tumble my moon because with that you have 100 kk of defense, dare to go without IP

  • this is imposible because what you said is relative, you can attack or no... maybe if you don't atack you can't use IP for a day... but you can avoid the ban if you attack whit a 1 cargo ship... it isen`t vieable.

  • I don't agree that there should be a limit, since if you limit the use of interplanetary missiles and you are a rocket bunker, you could not do anything against such people; Try to petar a bunker of 5 mrd and 300 edlms without missiles, if you can ... nothing that can not be what you say, if you shoot missiles and you are on with the AB are enough, a mixed player tells you.

  • Bomber Redesign

    Petete - - Archive - Suggestions

    Post

    I agree with rf gauss 2 but the consuption i think from 500 because 800 is too hight.

  • Bomber Redesign

    Petete - - Archive - Suggestions

    Post

    Bomber redesign: I have been investigating about the utility of the "Bomber" ship its pros and cons, why it is a ship that no one uses and I came up against the most famous ship ogame, the battlecruiser: * Battlecruiser IE = 70,000x7,000 Shields = 400x40 Attack = 700x70 Speed = 10,000x3,000 Load capacity = 750 Consumption = 250 Price ship = 30,000 metal, 40,000 crystal, 15,000 deuterium. Fast fire: -15 EDLMS -2 Destroyers +5 spy probes +5 Solar satellites +3 Small cargo ships +3 Large cargo ship…