No battlecruisers?

    This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

    • No battlecruisers?

      I just noticed that battle cruisers are not listed in the technology tab nor any of the rf calculations for the other ships.

      I was wondering if there were any plans on bringing them back in (hell just replace the place holder that is the gamma glider with bc's) into the game or not?

      Battlecruisers were by far my favorite ship back in the day as a fleeter the lack of them is saddens me as they were that had a perfect spot between battleships and destroyers in terms of progression. And they were extremely useful in smash and grab hits.
    • Sunthios wrote:

      Battlecruisers were by far my favorite ship back in the day as a fleeter
      Hehe... back in the days there weren't any battlecruisers at all. They were introduced to game later and took out the beauty of various fleet composition building.
      They are damn effective ships of course, but once gameforge intruduced them to game all fleet composition started to look the same and battleship, once so great war ship, became as good as fodder.
      It may sound ironic, but as a fleeter without battlecruisers in game you have now more than one route to go. Lets pick the fodder ship first... and no it does not need to be lightfighter anymore.
      ex #1st ranked uni14 .org
      ex #1st ranked uni1 .us
      ex #1st ranked andromeda .si
    • Sorc wrote:

      Sunthios wrote:

      Battlecruisers were by far my favorite ship back in the day as a fleeter
      Hehe... back in the days there weren't any battlecruisers at all. They were introduced to game later and took out the beauty of various fleet composition building.
      They are damn effective ships of course, but once gameforge intruduced them to game all fleet composition started to look the same and battleship, once so great war ship, became as good as fodder.
      It may sound ironic, but as a fleeter without battlecruisers in game you have now more than one route to go. Lets pick the fodder ship first... and no it does not need to be lightfighter anymore.


      At a certain point all fleets look the same when you get to Dessie's anyway. i just feel like they were an awesome way to combat battle ship fleets without being forced to spam destroyers as much as possible. I felt like it added that final jigsaw puzzle on what counters what. I still always built battle ships usually in equal number to my battle cruisers and very rarely did I send one without the other on raiding missions.
    • Sunthios wrote:

      At a certain point all fleets look the same when you get to Dessie's anyway.
      That's not my experience. Destroyer was never all around ship owned by everyone. At least not by my experience.

      Sunthios wrote:

      I mean hell I started playing in 2006 and bc's were already in the game for a long long time.

      Huh? GF Introduced so called "interceptor" later re-named into "battlecruiser" at the end of 2006 / beginning of 2007 if I remember correct.

      "The Battlecruiser is highly specialized in the interception of hostile fleets. This ship, a technologic filigree, is deadly when it comes to destroy attacking fleets. With its improved laser cannons, it holds a privilege [sic] position between the heavy ships, where it can take down several of them in no time. Due to its small design and its enormous weaponry, the load cargo it's [sic] minimal, but this is compensated with the low fuel consumption of the built-in hyperspace engine” (GameForge, 2007)"
      ex #1st ranked uni14 .org
      ex #1st ranked uni1 .us
      ex #1st ranked andromeda .si