suggested on the NL com.
With this idea the hideouts cost not any fields anymore if you build them.
With this idea the hideouts cost not any fields anymore if you build them.
Hideouts take no fields anymore if you build them
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
-
-
+1
this can help a lot and i propose even to lower a bit the cost for small levels ensuring the protection of roughly 30-50k resources in newb accounts.
Is a pity to have a feature in game and not make use of it . -
I remember that this feature was mentioned as a promise when hideouts were first introduced...
-
as a tweak, disable the hideouts when inactive
Valent wrote:
+1 this can help a lot and i propose even to lower a bit the cost for small levels ensuring the protection of roughly 30-50k resources in newb accounts. Is a pity to have a feature in game and not make use of it . -
For the farming
-
I like the tweak of disapble after getting inactief.
-
Likewise, shutting them down along with periods of inactivity is a working compromise.
-
great idea..
too coasty + spending fields = not good motivation to use it
-
It's probably the only way people would use it, I still don't like the whole Hideouts idea, but since they're only used in early game stages it should be ok for new players to built them without spending fields.
-
... yes on the resources side I hope.
In the beginning there are enough free fields on your planet.
A few days after starting a new universe not only extra-DM user are out of sight
have cruisers or more and a new or slow player ist still waiting for his
first small cargo because he needs his res for building hideouts.
Free given Hideouts sorted 3:2:1 or 2:1:1 after validation up to 50k points
would help to find a good basement special for a lot new players.
Dalhauk -
Considering the amount of res that the dens protect, they won't be used, ever, by anyone except for the early stages in a new uni. Most likely not even then (res better used on other things). If they go offline after the player has gone inactive, this would definitely not cause any issues, but be accepted by most. For example, people could set up deut dens on their moons to be sure they have some deut to move a fleet around on them, bandits can have that completely stolen all the time, or if said bandit gets hit, he can't jump in recs to get the DF because all res on the moon including deut got stolen.
Unless dens are taken off the field count they won't be used. They'll be at almost the same level of use as Alliance Depots. And I think I remember that originally, at least when/how I heard it, dens were supposed to be kept off the field count. -
Horcon wrote:
Considering the amount of res that the dens protect, they won't be used, ever, by anyone except for the early stages in a new uni. Most likely not even then (res better used on other things). If they go offline after the player has gone inactive, this would definitely not cause any issues, but be accepted by most. For example, people could set up deut dens on their moons to be sure they have some deut to move a fleet around on them, bandits can have that completely stolen all the time, or if said bandit gets hit, he can't jump in recs to get the DF because all res on the moon including deut got stolen.
Unless dens are taken off the field count they won't be used. They'll be at almost the same level of use as Alliance Depots. And I think I remember that originally, at least when/how I heard it, dens were supposed to be kept off the field count.
Exactly. And yes that was the original plan -
There are now Dens anymore, they are included in the storage
LGBeing a QA is sort of like being a goal keeper. People only talk about you when youve screwed up. We are the silent guardians of game development, and they will never have to thank us.
-
Share
-
Users Online 1
1 Guest