another smiley. One witch shows sarcasm
We do need...
-
-
i go with this:
<_<
>_>
<.<
>.>
or this one: -
there don't fit.
board.de.ogame.gameforge.com/wcf/images/smilies/HHexe.gif
This one will do it.
Edith...hmmm don't works. -
-
noon...we wait for NMA....he nows what I mean.
-
this one is being very sarcastic >.>
-
no its not. It's missing the right nose.
-
it doesn't have a nose, but the eyes tell you all! they speak for themself and you know the smile is NOT honest
lol -
Jedi! wrote:
no its not. It's missing the right nose.
well all of our german smileys are hosted on a non https domain, even the Sarkasmus-Sign. Only my Aluhexat is useable But that one is for something else
Origin Admin
OGame-Tech Chief
-
-
NoMoreAngel wrote:
Jedi! wrote:
no its not. It's missing the right nose.
well all of our german smileys are hosted on a non https domain, even the Sarkasmus-Sign. Only my Aluhexat is useable But that one is for something else
-
maybe we need more active forum users?
-
that's for sure!
-
I looked for one of my favourite smilies the other day on the other board - the I object one, but it seemed to have vanishedKnow a trader? How about... HEAVY METAL TRADER?
After 10 years, clearly the best:
HoFs: NONE
HOF'd: by Leon (LINK)
Wars:
The Cons Vs. IG - LOST
ASGARD vs. OGN - LOST
HMT vs. The Outsider (player) - LOST
HMT vs. Ali The King (player) - LOST -
, This without the thumbs down and having a smiley instead of frown/slight frown kinda lip work might do as well for such.
Sarcastic gestures to say at a time are kinda hard to come by, but Sarcasm is usually found offensive though too.
, this two still gotta be the best ones to use say when used from, but to say on still, 50-50.
Say for counter-contrast-retro-control variable-factor-difference, Say say for approved or disapproved. (Should say thumb(s) up or thumb(s) down, but contrast is variable to say, least in regards to having Sarcasm as a topic interest, but of a "proval" standpoint say for retro-spec, seems 50-50 equal enough for otherwise. But probably still based on to many observes rather than reserves for still any reserves.)
Thanks,
Kellogen
-
Share
- Facebook 0
- Twitter 0
- Google Plus 0
- Reddit 0
-
Users Online 1
1 Guest