Search Results

Of course, it's serious ! ^ Thank you Francolino and a "super" Ogame Origin to and from You and Us :-))

voeuxp10.jpg From France, Happy New Year and best wishes to all of you ! We hope a "magnifique" unifusion ! and a magic Ogame !

Fantastic ! We'll use it to prepare the unifusions ! Thank you Gismo ^ and thank you to the author !

Quote from NusaDua: “My proposition would re-balance a little bit the game : 2 / 1.5 / 1. People will still be using "massively" the option : the cristal is rare, and the metal far too common. It will still be interesting to use it, but it won't lead to the current commercial distortion.” I agree completely ! For the moment, in fact, the rate is around 3/2/1 , at least in France. The game became too hard for fleeters needing deut for fighting every day ! It's only during wars that miners used to…

A very, very usefull project ! I like it I hope the whole Ogame world will use it if the GF is OK ^

Quote from kendiraton: “I'm one of the 2 (for the time being) in the last category... Nobody's perfect!” Oh Kendiraton ! we are in the same box ! What a surprise for me Do you notice, all you, that almost half the people who answered are more than 26 years old ! In my opinion this is VERY IMPORTANT for the future of our game ! To find such gamers who appreciate arrays, numbers, logic, strategy ... it's completely different as in the former years where very young pupils were talking about Ogame i…

No answer, no remarks ... A suggestion from our french board to try to solve the problems given above : When a planet of an active player is at the same place as a planet of an inactive player (a zombie), just move the planet of the inactive player instead of the planet of the active player ! what do you think of this idea ? Thank you

I think it's a good idea !

No answer to our simple french question : Quote: “As most of the people, I don't understand why you don't simply create totally empty universes as possible targets. ” I think we should have been able to understand why the GF has choosen an other method ! Damage for the communication between us ... Please, don't forget we are about 200.000 players in France and no one to answer us ! (no CoMa, no GA ...) Fortunately a french player translated 2 texts I gave him : - 1 : ogameuniverse.de/artikel/589…

Quote from Black Cat: “english is not the only language in the world, not even the most natively spoken language the author doesn't earn anything for this work, so you could be satisfied that he shares it ;)” I agree Black Cat The author shares his work on the french board and it is mentionned here : Tolerated Addons, Tools, Scripts & Skins - Proposals At the moment the author seems to be absent. So I try to translate but, as many french people, I can tell you I don't like using english language…

I agree ! it's a very good and usefull script ! A good motivating engine especially by using it in the alliance forums.

Nice, very nice script, very usefull ! Thank you and BRAVO :-))

Sorry Francolino but I'm disappointed by such a method ! For me it was evident that target-universes would be empty at the beginning of the process. Why ? - to treate EVERY PLAYER in the same manner ! I think it's VERY important ! A universe has its own character and the former players in the target-uni would benefit a lot (too much ! if you prefer) ! - to eliminate all accounts which are "problematic" and which occupy a huge amount of space in any target-uni you could choose. I know, creating n…

Hurray icon_cheers.png ! For us, the old players in the old universes Unifusions time is coming ! I remember my first posts here : Discussion about the Ogame.de Community Meeting and, that's true, all is changing and we trust in the future !! Good job to the GF !

Quote from SlowMotion: “Each idea which changes the organisation of the planets (15*499*9) is bad.” Before unifusion it's true ! But why not in the future, just to create larger universes ! Using concept I described here board.origin.ogame.de/board6-o…-pos-per-ss-4-unis-into-1/ it would be possible to double the size of the previously fusionned universes. Quote: “After some time this universes will also become empty, so we will need a new fusion for this universes.” Of course, but it would be no…

Quote from Aruthadu91: “I think 999 system per galaxy is good for all players. No ? ” I don't agree but sub systems with 30 planets, I think it would be a very good idea where the Sun (in fact a star) would be in the middle of the page. In that case there would be twice more players ! so 2 times less universes ! I think it may be a good solution for the future (after unifusions are done).

I think it's interesting to know the case of 2 different alliances in France : 2 alliances wich have counted about 45 players each one and created a long time ago (more than 3 years) The first alliance : About half were very young (12/15 years old) and stopped relatively rapidly The other players have stopped too for the next reasons : - 5 have not been able to play with the new design (too much upheavals in the menus, too slow, too much clicks to do) - 2 have left after recycling when AG, DG be…

I read again this proposal I prefer : Quote from asterix2: “It's an easy method which conserves the structure of the data : 9 Galaxies, 499 ss, 15 positions per ss. It can use as many universes as necessary to obtain a good number of players I agree too with what lrdfrb says : Quoted from "lrdfrb" - you may only choose new coordinates, if your current coords are already occupied - First the #1 player of U1 gets his planets, second #1 of U2, third #1 of U3. After that #2 of U1 and so on ..... so …

I agree completely !

Quote from kendiraton: “I'm playing on OGame.fr, and I really don't think the terra formula has to be changed. Why? because you choose the planets (and their sizes): if you're happy with a planet with 111 or 123 slots, then keep it. Otherwise, you will try again.” Of course, as you now, I don't agree. There, you're forgetting the old players surprised by the last modifications ! By cons I agree with the second part of your post (except : "and only it" ) : Quote: “What must be changed is the size…