Search Results

I agree with you both. I think It is necessary to change what exists in the current version. A remark please : why do you post here and not in the Suggestions Area there : board.origin.ogame.de/board15/ which implies sometimes an official feedback. Your remarks concern all the players in all communities, don't they ?

We saw for Ogame v3 : what a surprise for coming so rapidly in France Please, are the unifusions done in Germany or not yet ?

Quote from Francolino: “Target universes are: 1, 30 and a new empty universe ” Even a new empty universe ! What a good news ! I'm very happy to see something very concrete right now. Players were needing such informations and I, as a french player, I look forward to the subsequent operations impatiemment ^

Quote from sedilbur: “I just want to have some dates to say to own players to not give up the game until fusion arrived. Players don't care about anything else. THey just want to know if they will set the vacation mode or the deletion mode.” I agree ! I feel a real lack of motivation, even among the oldest players ! Excellent fleeters in old universes are leaving Ogame because they don't trust the GF ... Please GF be aware of that ! Hurry up with unifusions !

No problem for me. It seems strange ....

Quote from Toxicterror: “short: using the sun as a new expo position with other benefits than pos 16” not the Sun but an ordinary star which is the center of an extrasolar planetary system ^ This "ordinary star" could be dwarf, giant, super-giant .... as you like to create all kinds of events !

Quote from asterix2: “If I understand well, an alliance will be moved to a target-uni with all its members who have chosen this target-uni. Question : will be automatically the new founder of the alliance the old-one ?” Quote from eXecute: “We know about it and have that in mind.” Please, what about this question ? Are there news about alli.founders.status during the process of the unifusions ?

I like this kind of brainstorming ^ As alli. manager I need a lot of informations and it's difficult to obtain right now. We use our alli.forum to do that (power of the alli. with descriptions of the fleets for example) giving this information to all or only to specific players (it depends). I think we must do real efforts of imagination to improve alli.status and alli.role IG in Ogame. +1 of course For the wars I think we should think about this retained suggestion : Rethinking war on OG

Well, you are right Toxicterror and Azgaroth but just for fun I like this concept (without North and South if you prefer) but just to have a star (like the sun) in the middle of the star-system view. Quote from HodyCall: “PS: the idea of having 30 planets in a system, 2 on each orbital track... whoa! i dont know man! but I do like the idea of being able to target the sun... could we crash our fleets into it? ” This idea was an idea to obtain less uniserses (2 universes into only one ^)

I like a lot this concept ! Quote from HodyCall: “It also makes it harder for people to hide from one another, encouraging more interactions in the game.” Yes And combined with this other concept I gave here in August 2010 : Quote: “Like that for exemple: and we should use "planetary system" instead of "Galaxy view" which is totally wrong today ! Planet 15N " 14N " 13N " 12N " ... " 3N " 2N " 1N A nice space with a star like our sun in that space ! Planet 1S " 2S " 3S " ... " 13S " 14S " 15S N f…

Quote from Francolino: “They decided to use existing target universes because there is a "living structure" of alliances and player. And this decision is final without any chance to change it.” It is clear to us and I understand that the GF does not want to change anything now ... I regret that but the chosen method has the advantage of being very easy to repeat. As said by Francolino : Quote: “So be glad THAT the unifusion is coming now with a lot of good solutions - And as said, they talk abou…

Completely agree with Iguypouf ! Just to remember what I wrote in november 2010, in this topic : Quote: “Wednesday, November 24th 2010, 5:10pm Sorry Francolino but I'm disappointed by such a method ! For me it was evident that target-universes would be empty at the beginning of the process. Why ? - to treate EVERY PLAYER in the same manner ! I think it's VERY important ! A universe has its own character and the former players in the target-uni would benefit a lot (too much ! if you prefer) ! - t…

very good

Quote from Francolino: “You can use them for any of your planets, no matter which one.” Very interesting : "no matter which one" 3 max : we already knew Thanks

Quote from Gardien des Etoiles: “This is uncompatible with big changes with space to user suggestions and ideas.” Seen like that, you're right. What WeTeHa says is not really exciting saying "small new feature and changes within our planned updates." ... I feel it differently by participating in OO.

Gardien des étoiles I can hear/read you complaining about the past but I CAN'T hear/read you complaining about the future. The relationship between the GF and its users/players has changed dramatically these last few months and is changing more and more through a sincere exchange. So please forget the past and go ahead with us to the future of Ogame (Myself, I signed a petition concerning the unifusion about one year ago and I assure you that at that time I was thinking only bad things about the…

LOL Sure, you're right Francolino but as we say in France : "tu te débines" (it's a nice term ^)

Quote from Francolino: “Well .. i tell something more about me when i have time - All known things about me are only rumours !!” So we are impatient to know you better Francolino ^ except your age ^ you gave us ^ Please

I see that just now : ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Discussion around the merchant rates EDIT - 15/07/2011 I have updated the title of the topic, as the first idea (lower down the rates) is not a realistic possibility. The goal would be to find and discuss reasonable and acceptable alternatives to the current merchant rates. Acceptable means : without impacting GF incomes. ______________________________________________________________…

Of course, +1