Search Results

im pretty sure the pillory wouldnt be removed if the ogame team did their job in the past* and the gf didnt decide to go from one extreme(permaban for forgetting a trade) to the other extrem we have now(1 week ban for big time deliberate push) *there are way too few bans to account for all the cheating that is going on. the gf should provide better tools for GOs and rework the ticket-system. i find it funny tho that so many officials are willing to discuss this rather unimportant topic when they…

there was something very effective against bots some years back it was so effective that the gf decided to never do it again because it probally cost them too much € im not sure which year it was 2007 or 08 there was a huge banwave in every universe and the most active universes at the time had up to 150 bans i think. ogamewide there were severaly thousand banned accounts because of botusing the bots didnt click through accounts like humans(unless it was a makro script but i think thats way too …

or give just give us the old fleet overview back 98865.jpg couldnt find a better picture i never understood why you changed from the table view which gave real overview to the ill-designed format we got now the fleet movement page is bugged anyway - thats why we get redirected to 'fleet 1' since v6

in my opinion it doesnt matter if this feature would make pushing easier if you want to prevent pushing you have to have a discouraging punishments in place and not the soft ban times we have now in general im frightened that the realisation of this idea will be just too complicated. why do you need a building and cells? why do you force players to rebuild ships with these ressources? its hard to discuss this feature without numbers. are you out of dices and couldnt determine the values? :E

its something you have to hear/read about or be "forced" to do via a tutorial there really is no difficiulty in that mb some folks are too lazy to do it but certainly not too stupid

dont know if your post was moved from another thread because it doesnt make sense warm planets would receive a buff and cold planets would stay the same besides that at the moment everyone building solar plant and fusion reactor (expect for pos13-15) is wasting ressources furthermore given the state of the game everyone should go for planets with max temp. between 0°C and 10°C already again everyone not doing that is wasting ressources

if you have nothing to compare these numbers to why are talking about 'really high activity of players after the 6.0 release' then? shouldnt it be the same or rather less since all the bots stopped working? haha

i like the idea to flip items you dont need for other items or dm im not sold on the idea to turn ressources directly into dm tho you would have to regulate the function pretty hard so ppl dont stop buying dm for example you cap the amount at 5k dm a day and you have to spend it in the next 7 days otherwise it would vanish. so ppl cant buy admiral for 3 months via this function

doesnt cashback-dm automatically count as 'purchased'?

Quote from Blah: “In defense of gameforge if u have a look at the ideas coming from the beginning of this thread board.en.ogame.gameforge.com/boar…e-surprise-uni/ a” org isnt even a top3 community in terms of playerbase pl fr and de are all bigger and like the rest of the ogame wolrd only had very few or no non-acs universes at all i hope the setting is not based on this thread lol i would love acs aswell but will play there nevertheless(if i can get in :E ) mb acs is another bug source and beca…

mb you dont even need to change the formula - just change the base cost of recs with h15/i17

ofc i meant it related to the recs and not all ships i think thats obvious

the game isnt balanced at all even without taking the payment features into consideration bc op bs, bb are useless at their current state hf mb not as bad as the 2 above but still needs buffs im not saying that there aren't ppl who dont get them because of the consumption but the main reason ppl dont get fast recs are the costs and reasearch time - not the disadvantageous deu consume. no one said that flying with lower speed should be then cheaper - why would you say that? because of how the mec…

Quote from Horcon: “I believe I made my opinion clear on that it shouldn't change, iguypouf also seems to be of this opinion. ” good thats only your opinion which isnt worth anything if you cant back it up with facts the game doesnt become unbalanced even if you would reduce the costs of faster flights drasticly. the big obstacle of costs and research time still stands i think you dont see the big picute if you argue that combdrive recs would have a big disadvantage then - because that doesnt ma…

and how exactly does it become unbalanced if you pay the same amount of deu for the same flight time?

yeah its perfectly balanced with 47% if it was 46% more deu consumption for the same flight time it wasnt

how would it make the game unbalanced if it was the same amount of deu for the same flighttime?

the huge advantage is earned by speeding a ridiculous amout of ressources in the first place and i think no one here disagrees that faster flights should cost more deu why should flights with the same flighttime/speed as before should cost more and how would it make the game unbalanced if it wasnt the case?

because ogame is such a balanced game with its perfekt rock paper scissors system - oh wait, its not i would like to hear how it would make ogame unbalanced