Search Results
Search results 501-520 of 642.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
-
hello , welcome to World record of mines production - all data are verified in the respective countries ( i hope ) - deut production need to be calculate with temperature - all data here, is free content you can appear in this rank , for example create an account here : mines.oprojekt.net/index.php you can use this script to export bbccode : userscripts.org/scripts/show/92002 .test img { height : 13px; } .prod { text-align : right; border-right-style:dotted; border-left-style:dotted; border-widt…
-
Quote from 8arlock: “1) OK 2) Can I leave two buttons for 9000 and 12000 expo-points? In order not to enter the settings page script for a single parameter. ” only max 2 buttons Quote from 8arlock: “ I add this in my script: Quote: “The original idea of calculating the expedition belongs to Caprica Six board.ogame.org/index.php?page=Thread&threadID=650534” ” i saw that you remove this, certainly a mistake
-
1/ Quote from 8arlock: “I removed the function to the fleet next page, aka litte automatic behavior with your "click and change auto page fleet", from the script. This function is not essential for the script. It only affects the usability.” you can put it, it's ok 2/ for your expo buttons, you must keep just one button ( not a list ), a lot of buttons is considered like imitating commander feature "standard fleets"
-
Quote from asterix2: “ Yesterday I saw this part of a post on the board.de written by WeTeHa ” WTH does not share info here, and post only in the German forum those infos are needed by all coms
-
hello my first opinion is that your script do "imitating commander feature" and this is not allowed indeed with your script you can save "fleet composition" like "standard fleets" "flotte standard" in French => 100508103912659111.jpg and you make also a litte automatic behavior with your "click and change auto page fleet" i will ask WeTeHa, and he will do an official response