I think the problem would be solved if the System Admins applied an attack block themselves when they knew that fleets had to be recalled, to prevent damage to accounts. I have made a suggestion from this internally
Well we saw most people say that they don't like the rule, so I guess we will remove it or make a final vote about it. But as I said, we will discuss it in the team and see how we move forward with this, we work as a team there so I don't make the decision myself
Hey, That's something we could discuss in DK, our GA has it in his plans to review the rules there. Just send us a PM in DK and we can talk about it there
board.origin.ogame.gameforge.c…89a0ea7366b27ddb9a0aea6e8 It could also look like this, in the input field the default value could be 1 so you can easily activate 1 of them, or you can change the number to 2 if you want to activate 2 of them ect.
Quote from mmorpg-stat.eu: “Good morning everyone, For more than two months now, I haven't heard anything about the validation of my project. In friendship, I would like to know if the project is accepted or not. Many players in the community are eagerly awaiting this new module. best regards Fred staff@mmorpg-stat.eu ” Shole approved it here and requested a global API: mmorpg-stat (Request approval for the API module)
But if the creator gave him the rights to own the project, then it's his project now You will have to be patient with him, he doesn't have unlimited time, and I think he will finish it when he has time. And you are not required to donate anything, he asks it if you want to support his work that way, and new domain, hosting, certificates are not free
Quote from green: “Why don't you release the code in a github repo so anyone can contribute, at least via issues and pull requests? 100 eyes work better than 2, and you'd still have control and ownership over it. Don't be the bottleneck that prevents this plugin to go on... As for hosting, there's no need imho, if that has to be a problem. ” That's a good idea, then someone can look at the code and fix issues and Shole could release a new version when it's ready and working. Maybe even some new …
I think the alliance founder could check his members and remove the inactive ones, but having completely inactive alliances removed seems like a good idea
I don't think they will promote Discord because they don't own the servers, it will also be more difficult to do something if someone insults you. The chat might not be perfect right now but hopefully developers will improve it with time