Search Results
Search results 61-80 of 90.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
-
So you expect every server to adapt to lower consumption? The suggestion I made on the german board: Adapt it to the fleet speed of the universe 1x Speed => 50% 2x => 60% 3x => 70% 4x => 80% 5x => 90% 6x => 100% To help the people in 1x, because usually you dont try too spontaneuos things, since people will come online in the 2 hrs you fly. 1x - 65% 2x - 70% 3x - 75% 4x - 80% 5x - 85% 6x - 90% that was suggested by someone else
-
Joa ist eigentlich recht schnell gesagt. Einmal, oder mehrmals, im Monat ein Event, bei dem der Verbrauch gesenkt ist, um das rumfliegen zu animieren. Bevorzugt aufs Wochenende legen, sodass die Leute auch Zeit haben. Kann mir gut vorstellen, dass es sogar Umoddler motivieren könnte. Make an event that once or even more times a month the consumption is lowered. Put that evend on a weekend, so most people have time. i can imagine that it would promote people using their fleets and maybe even moti…
-
Planet Size
PostQuote from JoKy: “Ok maybe it was too tricky to understand. Why is the +25 field bonus takesn so often? Just because you will always take the bonus if you have the chance to do so. So it´s not the reason, that the Redesign field formular is not "suitable". LG So if you still don´t get it, it´s a NOPE ” This means the same sh*t is going to happen to deuterium consumption things? Well I got what you meant, but it's because we both are german. Wanted to keep it understandable for everyone here. We …
-
Planet Size
Postbfy.tw/92XU wat? In the end it seems to be pretty obvious that the current formula isn't suitable. Or is a change too hard?
-
Planet Size
PostSo In ogame.de there's currently only one universe without +25 Bonus out of over 25 Universes. Maybe we should accept that the current formula for planet size is bad and try to adapt it finally, instead of giving every universe +25 and making that feature nothing special anymore.
-
Quote from Mylil: “The reason it was in sharp decline and many people stopped playing is really, really simple. Reason 1: Commander and officers was the first wave in the decline. Reason 2: Battlecruisers - An OP ship that violated design guidelines that invalidated two core ships of the time [Battleships and Heavy Fighters] before more balancing was done. Reason 3: Nail in the coffin - Pay to Win DM overload that sacrificed all the competitive integrity of the game and replaced it with a fast t…
-
I would be fine with "go to page x" - if you want to keep up the skill gap and find searching too easy. After a long night I have at least 20 pages of spys a 50 spys per page. Thats just too much clicking (especially since it seems to trash my firefox + kill memory or whatever => system gets slower) If there's the bug that spys arent deleted I go up to 70 pages (happened twice already)
-
Quote from Lord Katrosh: “The only requirement is that the defender sleeps at night, and this imho is not acceptable... ” Is everyone here playing late game accounts? For me it seemed so far that most universes are kinda dried out till they reach the point of 5.000.000 Points #10. Moon destruction happens rarely before this point. And after you have the problem that you usually don't have enough people to destory 10/11/12 moons with a high efficity (time/amount of rips/distance) Let's assume 850…
-
Okay I did some rough calculation: a6fde9e220.png G is a formula of: FX/D20 - D20 is Made from transfering 4500 Metall into Crystal and 5500 Metal into Deuterium => I've taken Crystal as the limiting factor here. - I didnt have enough time to figure out a better solution so far, but I guess this works. Collumn K shows the number of recyclers to fill up the difference between new and old capacity. With the current approach we would be at a break even point of 31775 Recyclers on Level 16. That's a…
-
Buddy Requests
PostSounds good, thank you very much for the fast answer.