Search Results

This is a know bug and a fixed version for Firefox should be deployed soon.

Quote from JoKy: “Hint: A change can also be connected to a research or PREMIUM!!!!! *troll* ” ERMAHGERD GRAVITON RESEARCH!!!11

Quote from Lord Katrosh: “Quote from RiV-: “Please think about that it's already possible to survive against big fleeters. ” Not if you sleep, work or have a life outside the game. It's a game...nobody should have sleepless night for it...not every time at least...and maybe this change will push more people to fleet.. P.s. this new formula doesn't save who has big fleet, but al least will stop the mooncrash for nothing, there's people with four, five moon destroyed for a bunch of empty cargo... …

I agree with Ater, Lord and scorer here. And please think about that it's already possible to survive against big fleeters. I'm repeating myself but if you annoy big fleeters, it's obvious that you will have sleepless nights.

It would harm the game. People wouldn't park their cargos on their planets and there would be a smaller DF when you farm them with RIPs. So no thanks, if you want to do that, deploy from A to B then deploy back to A.

Testing this on live test servers is pointless, because no one really "plays" there, they just "test". The effects of such a change will only be visible in live universes where people actually play. Now to the ideas: Changing the speed of moon destruction missions seem to be a good idea, BUT it takes away very much of the pace of a speed universe. FSing gets safer, yes, and that's a good thing, but also things like mobiling in and popping a moon to lock a failed ACS defense fleet or something ge…

What?! This is no suggestion for AGO. Why should I suggest something for AGO when I'm the developer of it?

Already fixed for next version.

Pleeeeeeeeeeaseeee guys this is so annoying

Quote from RiV-: “TrashSim seems to still use the old loot algorithm: ODHNNJE.jpg ” This still isn't fixed

Quote from Imperor: “It's my opinion, this is a war ship game..., would you build fleet having x10 economy?” What do you want to build else if your planets are full and you can't build mines anymore?

TrashSim seems to still use the old loot algorithm: prntscr.com/b12ttt

Ofcourse there has to be a disadvantage, and higher deut costs are a disadvantage, but triple deut costs are too high. As I said, at a certain point you are forced to have the speedrecs. You also can't choose to research HD higher than 15 but not having the speedrecs. But nevertheless the fact that some players have speedrecs forces you to also have them, otherwise you won't get any DFs anymore.

I would also suggest a change in the consumption of recyclers. The reason is as a little / mid class fleeter you can't afford the higher deut consumption but you are almost forced to upgrade your recyclers' drives, because if you don't your chances to get a DF sink rapidly, because there are always fleeters around with faster recs and they get there almost always before the slower recs. 300 -> 600 -> 900 is just too high. I know this upgrade was intended as a luxury upgrade but with most of the …

Quote from Minion: “Just, out of curiosity, what would happen here: board.en.ogame.gameforge.com/b…r-bigboy-rio-td-1172-5bn/” This hit wouldn't have happened with the WF for sure. Defender came online shortly after and insta clicked 500k recs. With the WF, the attackers would have more losses than him and wouldn't even have attacked. Quote from JoKy: “And for that case my personal opinion is like: if I loose really more then the defender and the defender get the whole debris field, it´s the fail…

You can change the colouring to something like this: ji5gbgc.png

Many thanks for the update! Perfect

Quote from Warsaalk: “I have already done some tests for this, at which resolution should this happen? I have 3 options, 1366, 1600 or 1920. What is your resolution?” Mine is 1920 Would love such a change. That's probably the last thing which keeps me from using TrashSim.

No feedback for this?

Yes, OGame 6.1.1 changed the planet tooltips and AGO isn't adjusted to it yet