Search Results

Quote from kendiraton: “I'm playing on OGame.fr, and I really don't think the terra formula has to be changed. Why? because you choose the planets (and their sizes): if you're happy with a planet with 111 or 123 slots, then keep it. Otherwise, you will try again.” Of course, as you now, I don't agree. There, you're forgetting the old players surprised by the last modifications ! By cons I agree with the second part of your post (except : "and only it" ) : Quote: “What must be changed is the size…

I think it's a good idea but only during unifusions and for players who had DM in 2 different accounts from which they shall select only one. But maybe the GF will solve this kind of problem differently ?

I think it's a good idea but only during unifusions and for players who had DM in 2 different accounts from which they shall select only one. But maybe the GF will solve this kind of problem differently ?

Just my opinion as a former developer : once a significative choice has been done and executed, I think it's too late to go back ! Allow the reuse of a former software not maintained is a real responsability I would never accept.

Quote from Valent: “ingame chat for alliance will be great , an internal one will be just wonderful” Quote from Raicheron: “Not every one has his chat progammms everywere. A simple chatbox in the "Allianmenü" could help there. ” I agree ! That's would be wonderfull in the "alliance menu", and even better if it would be possible to invite players of an other alliance (wing for example) Top confort for all during war, for trade, for fun ...

Quote from Valent: “ingame chat for alliance will be great , an internal one will be just wonderful” Quote from Raicheron: “Not every one has his chat progammms everywere. A simple chatbox in the "Allianmenü" could help there. ” I agree ! That's would be wonderfull in the "alliance menu", and even better if it would be possible to invite players of an other alliance (wing for example) Top confort for all during war, for trade, for fun ...

Sorry for this second post. Please, in case of "more fields per level", would-it be with retroactive effect ? It's important for our thinking. Thank you

Quote: “Hi. We still think about it to change the formula...but more or less for some other changes in the future. Most probably with just more fields per level at the moment...but maybe this thought could be changed...” Knowing that the GF is now thinking about the formula of the terraformer is a very good news ! both for old and new universes. Thank you for having said it From our side we continue to think about it also.

I think you're very severe ! And Ogame is also make for noobs but in the case we are discussing, these are not noobs but players who have been disappointed by the last modifications (made too rapidly ! just a few days in France to modify something eventualy)

Quote from marshen: “so you cry about everything that isn't working as you like, in this damn forum, INSTEAD of thinking how you solve a problem! a game is about finding solutions or strategies AND not about crying on the devs shoulder until they help you!” Marshen, it's your opinion ! As I told you here : Astrophysic tecnology in old universes Quote from asterix2: “remember there are tens of thousands players in France and that : Ogame is a game and in Ogame, as in any kind of game there are ve…

Moderate an ally-chat ? icon_scratch.png IRC is a very good tool but I think all the players don't like it .... and it's a real effort to install it ...

Quote from restlesz: “The ally chat... Yeah it could be a nice idea.” I agree with that very good idea developped IG ! Sometimes we have to ask for help or we must decide and do something very quickly ! I think it's an essential tool to play effectively without using external tools of communication.