Search Results

Quote from Smoke Nightvogue: “For someone who resides in V-Mode due to absence of time, or the notion is that it somehow prevents V-Mode fleeters from over-extensively applying this feature in situations where a long fleet save is anticipated? I'll tell you what such a fleeter will do in an old Universe, when he runs out of these 52 sessions on the account. He'll simply grab another one from a long list of fleets which are most-likely available to his acquaintances or the alliance. Simply becaus…

This is a great idea, anything is better then what you have now. The 48 hour rule accomplished nothing.

Ok, it was nice to get miners opinions, surprise, surprise with your answers ;-). But in reality fleets are vmoding due to insufficient amount of duet available. The increase in vmode time doesn't encourage people to play more, and did not solve the underlying issue. Granted there was a problem with vmode fleeting, but the way it was dealt with was short sighted and insufficient; back on topic. Just because something was changed in the past, like a year or two ago doesn't mean it can't be tweake…

With the fleets getting bigger and bigger and player count falling. I propose you change Plasma Tech Research to 1%, 1%, 1% increase per level. This will help miners and fleeters. Miners will have more to sell, and fleeters will produce more for ships and fuel. I also think this will help people build stable accounts.

I agree, merge the darn uni's already....people are quitting from boredom! Who cares about version 6 if there is no one to play the game.

Quote from Valent: “It was a test of gradual changes in a new uni , i don't have information what it was the result or what was expected from this test but would be interesting to see how you see such a " evolving " universe . Opening a new thread would be great.” Honestly I would just be wasting my time.......we both know that.

Quote from Valent: “ @letssled, Origin board is not meant for discussing specific community rules. Yes, org game admins are reading the thread you are talking about and we are aware of your concerns but please , here is not the place to discuss them. Please continue ( use calm and logic ) the discussion in .org forum. ” Actually I wrote that days ago, I was going to edit it immediately after I sent it but I couldn't as I was waiting for my post to be approved , but what is down is down....I want…

Quote from Valent: “However, GF is listening , that is for sure. It is the task of admins to see what their community wants/ needs , talk to their Coma and thus get the desired decision - but only if it is possible or it is advisable to implement it. This shows how important is to have good, active admins and good, communicative CoMa In addition to this classic channel we have this whole origin project to ensure a more direct way to communicate. This is not replacing the traditional way: player …

Quote from Valent: “I also like the idea of having a small reward for active play instead of punishments for v-moders. I already made a suggestion similar to this here: increase the daily login bonus” I missed that Valent, sry. I guess I have preference to one accumulating automatically to keep the game simple. vmode fsaving is a simple "one box click", don't even have to turn mines off now. So with the 1% per week, it would just start and continue. My $.02.

I will post my "final proposal" so you don't have to scroll through so many replies: 1. 1% mine increase per week of account out of vmode. 2. Max of 5% booster after 5 weeks. 3. Independent of all other boosters. 4. Does not matter if account is ( i ) or ( I ). 5. If vmode is entered, booster returns to 0% ( can restart after 7 days).

Like the name says they is something that was discussed in .org. It had only one negative comment. Just following a suggestion to post it here and thought that it might be considered for implementation and/or more feedback. HERE Thanks, letssled Moved to proper area ~Killacrazy