I'm having a strange issue with the cargo's calculation.
see the attach.
see the attach.
TrashSim - OGame combat simulator
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.
-
-
I'm attacking with 20 cargos, it's showing 17 cargos for full plunder, and with 20 cargos still 99%
-
Simulations are still not correct.
1500 RIPs vs. 1000 RIPs + 150k RL
SpeedSim says:
Battle on: Fight at Unknown [x:xxx:x]
Result: | Draw (100%) | after ~ 6 rounds
Debris Field: 3.532.257.000 Metal (48%), 2.834.757.000 Crystal (49%) max. 331867 Recycler
Losses Attacker: 7.295.000.000 Metal, 5.836.000.000 Crystal and 1.459.000.000 Deuterium
Losses Defender: 4.782.586.000 Metal, 3.618.190.000 Crystal and 869.000.000 Deuterium
Moonchance: Chance that a moon arises is 20%
Theoretic Plunder: 0 Metal, 0 Crystal and 0 Deuterium ~ 0 Small Cargo
Real Plunder: 0 Metal, 0 Crystal and 0 Deuterium (0% Booty)
Needed Fuel: 0 Deuterium (Recycler: 0 Deuterium)
Flight times: 00:00:00 h (Recycler: 00:00:00 h)
Plunder from Waves: 0 Metal, 0 Crystal and 0 Deuterium after 1 attacks (max. 331867 Recycler)
TrashSim:
-
RiV- wrote:
Simulations are still not correct.
The problem was caused by a change in the previous update.
Thanks for the report
Problem should be fixed now, can you confirm it?
View changelog below. -
Yes, results seem to be pretty accurate now
Thanks for the fix. -
And the cargo's calculation issue?
It's still live…
7 Large Cargo Needed -> 7 Large Cargo Sent(also after the combat) = 78% Captured -
RamonXD wrote:
And the cargo's calculation issue?
It's still live…
7 Large Cargo Needed -> 7 Large Cargo Sent(also after the combat) = 78% Captured
Hi,
Your previous post didn't seem to be much of a problem to me.
I though it was more a result of an average mistake, but this seems to be something else.
Can you, again, send me a screenshot of the simulation, in PM to me?
Thanks!
Grtz,
War -
Flight time seems wrong…
See the attach… 16:01:10 h for just 45 solar system
-
nvm, I'm noob, hahahaha
made a I huge mistake in the simulation
-
Hello!
There seems to be a huge problem with the ACS...
Example 1:
Example 2 (same ships but splitted over 2 attackers):
look at the different losses for example...
Cheers -
There's a bug with load espionage report from api and shield domes.
To replicate the bug, load an api for the defender like this one
sr-en-136-62f46aabc6de934666c12705ed8064306e3bb397
then check the box for large shield, then load the api again. It will include the large shield even though its not part of the api.
I run into this issue constantly when loading multiple APIs from different scans/players.
The workaround seems to be to uncheck both dome boxes before loading the next api. -
Is it possible to add tactical retreat to this as well? For example, if my fleet is greater than 5:1 ratio, its a pretty safe bet that the fleet will retreat and I will only go up against defenses. So what I really need to know is how my fleet will do against defenses, not fleet and defenses.
Current workaround is to load up my fleet and the defender api. Then see if tactical retreat will be in effect and if it is, then manually delete just the fleet part from the defender. Now I can calculate how my fleet will do against defenses only. -
@swizzor
The ACS problem should be fixed in the next update
Can you test it again when it's released?
@DrBlink
The Dome problem will also be fixed in the next update.
As for the tactical retreat problem:
I do not fully understand what you want, but I was already planning on adding a live tactical retreat ratio.
Is that what you're looking for?
Grtz,
War -
@Warsaalk
Sure!
Cheers -
I was looking for the defender's fleet to be ignored in the simulation if they will tactically retreat.
I use this simulator primarily for raiding so its important to know how many cargos/ships i need to send but since the sim includes the defender's fleet even though they will tactically retreat, it leads me to send more ships than I need to.
-
Share
-
Users Online 8
8 Guests