Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 154.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

  • Lobby feedback&questions

    RiV- - - Feedback & Discussions

    Post

    Can we expect an update soon that enables unlinking/trading accounts?

  • Increase of shipcount in one buildorder

    RiV- - - Usability

    Post

    Why not add this and make it so the 99.999 just adds 10 of the regular 9999 build orders? That way there's no need to change the way how the DM features work and it wouldn't be too hard to make this work

  • Can we expand this change on RIPs as well so they benefit also from increased cargo bays? Would be nice for those of us who like to use them as deluxe cargos

  • Quote from revex: “bug-fix is taking a while for that one? ” I'm not planning on fixing it tbh, since it's too much effort for just a bit of res.

  • No matter how, decreasing deut costs with researches is very welcome

  • It's been like that since Expeditiontech was changed to Astrophysics

  • @Minion That was always like that. And AGO has been showing slightly wrong costs since ages. Quote from badkarma: “- When you're using the jump gate on a moon, clicking on the numbers doesn't fill anymore the textfield” Which numbers do you mean?

  • Quote from Legacy: “How does it make sense 300kk goes down for a moon worth couple of millions? ” You are wrong, the moon is not just worth couple of millions. Depending on your fleet size, it can be worth over 100 million points. Because if you lose the moon you dont just lose the moon but also your fleet.

  • Show combat technology as default

    RiV- - - Suggestions

    Post

    They will learn eventually

  • Show combat technology as default

    RiV- - - Suggestions

    Post

    board.origin.ogame.gameforge.c…6814c3b2249b113e14cf98220 Easy.

  • The LAST buttons

    RiV- - - Bugs & questions

    Post

    Quote from islandwoodsie: “But how /why in the world would you name it SHOW? I don`t know how a person would be able to understand what that means. ” Because the first option is "disable", the third option is "show & reuse", the second option is "only show, but don't reuse automatically". Some things need to be tested in order to understand what it means. This is the shortest way to express what is meant.

  • The LAST buttons

    RiV- - - Bugs & questions

    Post

    Quote from islandwoodsie: “Is it not possible to make those a ONE Time use. It aggrevates the heck out of me to find i have just wasted 100,000,000 duet sending something somewhere i had NO intention of doing. And also after i have launched my 5 expos and go to do something else only to have it tell me i have exceeded my expo limit ” i.imgur.com/8sNx4iI.png Quote from islandwoodsie: “OK and also while i have your attention. When i select in AGO to send a Destroyer along with an expedition fleet …

  • Quote from echonia: “1- fleeters would enjoy this feature a lot more than miners because recycler capacity would increase and they wouldnt have to spend more resources to build more recyclers and they wouldnt spend as much deut as they do now. 2- miners already save some of their resources by building mines or save with research when they dont have much capacity on their fleets. long story short, fleeters would have more advantage over miners. this idea would work in favor of fleeters. ” I don't…

  • @m3nd3s You didn't get my post. Please read it again. @scorer As I already said multiple times, changing % is no solution, because "top fleeters" don't leave their fleets to chance, no matter how low the % is. And I really feel like we first need to discuss the basic problems I stated in my post rather than discussing a solution to a problem we don't agree on.

  • After having few discussions in private/on IRC, I think it is important to agree on the problem that needs to be adressed before we discuss specific ideas, because the different opinions on this topic result mainly from different views on the game itself. It would help if GF could give us their opinion on this. In my opinion, the problem that needs adressing and also the problem the TC is trying to solve is what I want to explain in the following: We can distinguish between "mainstream fleeters"…

  • What most people don't get is this: Every "solution" that includes a chance is not a solution. No fleeter will FS his >100M fleet if there is the slightest chance that his fleet will go down. These people don't keep their fleets for years for no reason. They keep it because they don't leave their fleet to "chance". So the solution has to adress the "time" issue. Waking up every 1.5h to guarantee that the fleet survives is inhuman IMO. So we need to expand these 1.5h to something which is doable …

  • No planets

    RiV- - - Bugs & questions

    Post

    This is a know bug and a fixed version for Firefox should be deployed soon.

  • Quote from JoKy: “Hint: A change can also be connected to a research or PREMIUM!!!!! *troll* ” ERMAHGERD GRAVITON RESEARCH!!!11

  • Quote from Lord Katrosh: “Quote from RiV-: “Please think about that it's already possible to survive against big fleeters. ” Not if you sleep, work or have a life outside the game. It's a game...nobody should have sleepless night for it...not every time at least...and maybe this change will push more people to fleet.. P.s. this new formula doesn't save who has big fleet, but al least will stop the mooncrash for nothing, there's people with four, five moon destroyed for a bunch of empty cargo... …

  • I agree with Ater, Lord and scorer here. And please think about that it's already possible to survive against big fleeters. I'm repeating myself but if you annoy big fleeters, it's obvious that you will have sleepless nights.