Search Results

And the languagein all this? I see bad going on Ogame Taiwan eh

If the item is for sale in the import/export why not, but not against the DM

By speaking about that :° The patchnote IG would need to make a follow-up

Indeed on. Translation GameForge via Google are so more attractive, at least they, they are paid. In brief, as you showed me so splendidly yesterday, your translation and mine changes absolutely nothing the sense.

Just the value of the item (gold, silver, bronze) For example, Gold Metal vs Gold Kraken

I'm going in my bed °: thx

This suggestion was the object of a vote on the forum Fr (91% Yes (53) | 9% No (5)). The purpose would be to be able to echanger or resell objects of the same value (gold vs gold, silver vs silver, bronze vs bronze) with the other players. Objects useless of a player could so find a utility other than stay in the inventory. The idea bases itself on the system of the market of gladiatus.

Hi The idea would simply be to be able to organize the list. For example : sans_t14.jpg Be able to organize in order alphabetical or same to make groups (trade, alliance...) sans_t13.jpg

OK. I've just understood. I said nothing

Thus it would more be necessary to put has in the upgrade that in the tuto v4 ?

Chapter 18: Account settings --> update about new Vacation mode performance Hm, It's with v4 that the changes took place, no? edit : uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuup °:

Everybody doesn't use the mmo, and to play a RP it is better to have an ID card IG, no?

Hard ? Why ?

Hard ? Why ?

Small idea from the .fr A short summarized in the options of the account ( or ID card ) with - Date creation of account - statistical attack - statistical expedition

Small idea from the .fr A short summarized in the options of the account ( or ID card ) with - Date creation of account - statistical attack - statistical expedition

No ? =°

Other opinion?

Quote: “Quote: “The API should NOT replace the user projects like war riders or galaxytool - Someone who wanna have newest details have still to work for them. ” I fully agree. THE API would not change. But the information which appear in the API (the identifiers of the various "objects" composing Ogame: player, planet, moon) could as well apparaitre also in Ogame he even Somebody who uses the API can establish relational plans correct to identifiers. While somebody wishing details at time - rea…

Quote: “Hello I've just seen your announcement concerning Ogame API. Making left a developer of the OGSteam (developing mainly OGSpy), it's true that the appearance of "planet_id " and " moon_id" is an additional help for us. However, because of the low frequency of the updates of the API, it doesn't seem sufficient for a very active player. Where from my question: In a future, GameForge envisages you she to make these identifiers ingame, quite apparaitre as are it at present "player_id " and " …