Search Results

Quote from marshen: “this would be imbalanced. on those positions fusion reactor is already stronger because the deut production is higher which compensates a lot more of the fusion deut needs.” not exactly. Fusion Reactor is not stronger on those positions, its the same, while deut production is another thing. I like the suggestion cause it sounds pretty logically to me, that in cold positions sats work worse, while fusion works better. Sats are not that safe as fusion, but still the best and i…

Currently noobprotection would be only in new universes, but i think idea was for all universes, isnt it?

Quote from sirEdward: “that the Fusion reactor could be built only on positons 11,12,13,14,15.” makens no sense, cause its very hard to find good planet on 10-11 positions and impossible for 13,14,15. Btw i think Fusion Reactor is pretty good, but not that much stong to be an alternative for SS. Perfect way is to nerf satellites and buff other sources of energy, but i doubt that GF will do it. Quote from sirEdward: “This building is here sure only for fun. GF can probably rescue this by adding n…

Redfox, please follow the rules and dont use bad language

Sorry didnt read whole discussion, but i assume it was mostly against this idea? I kinda like this idea, cause it will just help avoid those annoying situation when i have queue for hundreds days, which u/or previous owner did accidenty. Improving only shipyard(without nanites) won't that much increase number of "turtles".

Quote from Toxicterror: “I dont think its a good idea to make the commander even worse than it is now.” Even worse than now? Its the best premium feature for raider. Quote from Toxicterror: “A few years ago, before the officers existed, the commander was a premium feature which gave extended funktionality to certain things and other bonuses.” And what were them? Quote from Toxicterror: “And why should it? Just because you like to?” Because those are premium features. Players donated/payed money …

As for now only Commander removes advertisements, i would suggest to remove advertisements for all other officers as well.

That was implemented or not?

That was implemented or not?

In recent update GF added meta names in CR about ally, thats how they implemented this idea? Source Code (2 lines)

Up. I dont think that its that hard to do

Quote from Azgaroth: “So if none of the player’s planets/moons shows activity, what are the dangers you are facing?” Well, i was in situation when I probed player 1 and saw fleet. Started my flight, while player 2 was waiting for that and ACS defended player 1, ACS slow down saved me, but there were no real reasons why i should do that, cause player 1 didnt show any activity. I suggest to slow down ACS in almost every situation.

Well actually ive heard about bug, when the new player appears on the position that was targeted for relocation, then planet moves to the slot next to it

Well, thats how it should work. Dont know why it wasnt implemented before. So +1

Basically add an option in game menu to ask about confirmation when you want to cancel one of the fleets. When this option is turned off everything should work like it does now.

Quote from Francolino: “In case your new position is over 30 systems next to the old one, you get maximal three free relocations.” Is that still true? Or GF changed their minds?

Thats what i was thinking about few days ago! +1

Quote from vulca: “edit : Taro, before it was forbiden when you had all your planets ;)” o rly? Before RD it was forbidden to fleetsave with colonize mission when u have all nine colonies? PS not in my community

Whats the actual difference? Even before it was uncatchable. Instead of 1 slot u had to use 2-3 slots and thats it.

Em, dont think that most people need that:))