^This. And: You need 19 slots to transfer all ressources to a planet/moon. And if that really is a problem just give everyone +1/2 fleet slots so you don't have 1 fleet slot but 2/3 at the beginning without CT.
Costs of Astro 19 (needed for 20 planets): 94.786.146 Metal, 189.572.293 Crystal, 94.786.146 Deuterium Costs of Comp 19 (needed for 20 fleet slots): 104.857.600 Metal, 157.286.400 Deuterium If you can afford Astro 19, you should also be able to afford Comp 19
Quote from SlowMotion: “Player can possible have access to "old" data, like messages to attacks which has been made after ban and before look” I don't see the problem here. Why not give the user full access to the account without being able to "disable the vmode"?
Quite simple: defense/sats are for defensive purposes, you can't harm anyone with them. Other ships and IPMs can be used for offensive purposes and thus are deactivated.
Quite simple: defense/sats are for defensive purposes, you can't harm anyone with them. Other ships and IPMs can be used for offensive purposes and thus are deactivated.
Quote: “4. you keep 1 new planet every 2 levels of astrophysics like in the current version” Seems that some people didn't realize that this idea is only for a special universe - this change making the universe special. No one wants to change Astrophysics to 1 colony per level in every universe... Quote from kendiraton: “5. you multiply the cost for each astrophysics level by 3 (instead of 1.75 - quite surprisingly, 1.75*1.75 is just above 3). This would reduce the expedition capabilities (and t…
You forget that the purpose of UNoWin's suggestion is not solely the solution of the deut problem And surely it wouldn't be the same game but that's not a bad thing IMO. Whether this idea fits in the plans of GF or not is none of our business. We should wait for WTH to give a statement and if it's positive we can go for balancing the whole thing.
The point that some people don't get is that this are first approaches. The Skills/Masteries aren't set in stone and can be further discussed and thus balanced. But overall I really like the idea If WTH says that this is considerable, we can discuss on balancing things
I know it's an old topic, but currently there is an ongoing discussion on the .de-boards with some really original suggestions. For those of you who are not familiar with the problem: An account with bought DM can not be deleted due to legal issues and thus there are several "dead" accounts in the universes taking the good positions. Some of them are normally inactive, some of them are in vacation mode and some are even banned til 2038. In older universes with less players this isn't such a big …
This would only lead to more turtles and would enlarge the gap between tops and non-tops. Contrary to your claim, there WILL be a top 1 destroying everything.
Thanks 8arlock, I will have a look Quote from marshen: “you dont need the function dont you? thought it was only to get your own namespace (which you should because otherwise stupid things may happen)” Which function do you mean?
ToDo list: - Compatibility to other browsers - Option to transport needed ressources for levels x to y - A queue for more than one transports - Choice between LC and SC - Option to send the needed ressources from seperate planets