Search Results

personally I see possible problems by this idea and i don't see a particular improve in game

I don't think it is a good idea for 2 motives: 1) in this way someone will create 10-20 multyaccount that use to find darkmatter in spedition and then transport dark matter for the real account 2) if someone will stole account, will can stole also dark matter If you want to help your friend, you can buy dark matter in his account using your phone or your credit-card .......... I think this way is more safe

I think it is possible to copy/paste report in other place .............. why asking often change to simplify manage of game ? Manage of game is also a skill

@Sorcy ........ if for example tomorrow will arrive this news: "there is a problem of security in code, but we don't know how many time request to manage code or if we will be able to fix it. Sorry". With this example what will be your reply ? Do you think that it is impossible that situation is this ?

sometimes players should remember that retro server is a gift from GameForge, not something that was due to it. And when server started one simple thing was wrote "no support" = "no fix bugs, no developen of code, no edit of code ...... only normal check of rules". Retro server is started for the work of a developer (a lot of edit in code to have possibility to have a working universe that requests near 1 year) that now don't work anymore for GameForge ....... so don't sound so strange that now …

Non esiste nessuna direttiva o regola occulta in nessun gioco della GameForge di bannare un giocatore che non compri mai moneta virtuale. Fintanto che la politica della GameForge sarà il free to play , sarà una cosa normalissima far coesistere nello stesso server utenti che comprano moneta virtuale e giocatori che non comprano. I giocatori non paganti, sono utili al divertimento tanto quanto sono utili i giocatori paganti alle casse della società. Se togliessi i giocatori non paganti, ci sarebbe…

Quote from Daidegas: “Hi. sorry for my bad english, but i have some questions. How many years has this version of Ogame been used? How can such this big bug appear only now? i can understand a little bug with graphics or others... but a big mechanic bug like this.. i smell burnt Bye ” Possible explanation could be: 1) nobody before have found it 2) in other version bug was fixed, but was not possible to use because there was a lot of things to change or remove 3) version 0.77 is borned a lot of …

For what say the rules, I think no, but maybe better to wait an game admin Quote from ButtonDan: “3. Account Sitting Account sitting on retro server is not allowed. ” Italian: basandomi su ciò che è scritto nel regolamento di gioco previsto per il retro server, il sitting non è permesso. Però meglio attendere un GA per sapere se in caso eccezionale è permesso. Certamente per il fatto che qua non si può cambiare email e password non è una scelta tanto sicura dare in giro i propri dati di accesso.

500.000 deuterium don't sound expensive for players with 100 milions of points Quote from Valmone: “It not will be an invisible fleetsave, because anything player who see the movement of the moon can be attack the fictitious moon 1s after the arrival of the moon, you can destroy the fleet (if she's present). ” You can see moon in moving, but you don't see ships over moon ............. Maybe someone studying player will be sure to know what is moving with moon, but in most of case I want to see w…

Personally I don't like this idea, because a part of game will become more easy. I don't see as an improve of game. It will be also an invisible fleetsave. Maybe if should possible to use this function only any 6 months, then could be a compensate for the existence of relocation; but no any moments

I moved suggestion in right place

I have no news. Yesterday I asked information at one CoMa, but he said to ask again tuesday, because he was not updated about situation and there were nobody who ask. I know that you don't like to pass a week without information, but now we have to wait to pass Easter

For the moment we didn't received new information from GameForge. About argument vacation vs block attack , I remember that usually when there is a roleback using a backup is normally happen to see a block of attack, but never saw all account setted in vacation. So for my opinion it is more probably to hope in a block of attack that in a vacation of account .......... also if it is true that don't should be hard to manage database to set holiday. A very important thing that you should think abou…

I understand problems of anybody (i play in this uni too) , and for sure if possible a block of attack or a vacation mode could help. But you have to remember always that this is a special universe on an old version of ogame that it is not completely supported . For example was need to edit some part of code to make work in a modern server for software compatible ........ so probably atm nobody know : 1) if exist a periodic backup as is in normal universe 2) if it is possible to active block att…

Please don't spam When staff will have more info, they will write. Probably is need action of a developer to edit code, but in week end normally don't work ; so we have to wait when a developer will have time to work around retro server (maybe monday is busy with normal Ogame)

I close thread by request of his autor

If you want to write in your signature "m3ntol banned for bashing for 3 days" (of course is an example), probably you can do. Sure you cannot open a thread wrting "m3ntol banned for bashing for 3 days .......... what do you think?" Any words wrote in email/pm/ticket that you can receive is personal and private, so you cannot share.

after 10 days of v-mode (or an other time), planets become special. Outside these planets will appear with 0 ships, 0 defense, keep all the research and construction and will start with 0 resources. Mines will start producing normally, in the deposit capacity limits. So will be possible to spy and attack these planets without acs (no other kind of missions). Why did I call them "special" ? Because in real they are still in v-mode and this want to say that the owner when it will remove the v-mode…

Quote from vakus: “I do not get the point that you are trying to make, but if you could expand on this I would be happy to understand your views on this ” I think he want to say that when someone set his account to deletion, it is because want to be sure that nobody will receive push from his resource/debris ........... so first step should be that manual deletion of account don't give possibility to attack nothing. And probably also who set v-mode and then his account is deleted by inactiving p…

Public discussion about ban is prohibited in any way you can think about it.. You can also tell at other people that you are banned for motive X , but in that way this could be interesting other people ? Of course you want to tell that you are banned, to complain in public about it, and this is prohibited. There is case in that staff cannot give a complete answer about motive of ban, because there are informations that could help players to understand how work controlls and then to be more easy …