Search Results

@Thomas The work around is to go planet after planet to the resources production page. I faced that in thr past, but in my case was another extension which was making noise

Hi T1T4N, Thanks for publishing your idea and also providing a translation of it So if I understand correctly, this ships or research would increase the storage size... but at what price? Should be like a middle point between a DeathStar and a Large Cargo? (I do agree with 100k, maybe a little bit more) What do you think it's better in order to have this? Sacrifice Ship Speed or Deuterium Consumption? Thanks for your feedback!

I agree regarding .crx (It's just a special ZIP file with a .crx suffix) by "special" means it has an extra header added. Assuming something similar happens for Firefox (.xpi)... there is no point in not allowing it

Agree. This was going to be a problem, especially in .FR What about > 1 month inactive accounts with low points dissapear? How many accounts are we talking about and how many are we looking forward to remove?

Sadly true. I was not even able to reach him when I found a bug for duplicating battles, hope he is fine and just with a lot of work.

Translated to English: Quote: “Expedition Ship: For many years, people have been discovering new corners of the universe, it has not happened that the expeditions shipped were attacked and did not return. But now that we have such a great knowledge, we can go everywhere. 1) production costs: (250 thousand metal / 35 crystal crystal / 50 x dedeuter) 2) Structural points (285 ths) 3) Coating (1000) 4) Attack power (300) 5) speed (67.5 ths) 6) load capacity (70 thousand) 7) fast acts against Little…

Agree, it´s a nice addition. Maybe this can help you in the meantime CerealOgameStats

What do you think about this approach @RiV- regarding enabling and disabling features used in OGame UI++? Google Chrome extension : OGame UI++ Example: i.imgur.com/xP2O3Dh.png and you can just literally click on any of that images to enable/disable any feature Now, I think that for AGO any app can produce problems, as AGO tries to cover everything. So there can be tons of conflicts with other extensions. To be completely honest with you, I'm not a big fan of AGO, but I know it's a really useful …

@Warsaalk it's your turn to be a hero

Hi @vld Now I do really understand you and agree with your idea. I'm not a big fan of AGO, but that tactic I have used to in order to make attackers feel I'm offline and boom Let's make it real

Hi @vld Thanks for sharing your idea. But before, I want to completely understand the benefits or outcomes you are expecting. - Why would it be useful? - What's the impact for the players after adding this feature? - Would it also be useful to display when does the server 'resets'?

Please, just tell me this is a prank as part of the Programmers' Day

This is the code Riv forked from (github.com/mbin84ng4wopn8asn4m…n4tagn7mab/source/network) (The code is public as anyone can get into this link in GitHub - github.com/mbin84ng4wopn8asn4m8nv4ha98n4tagn7mab/source) Just making a piece of code publicly accessible is not what it takes to call it open source software. Now, according to license.txt github.com/mbin84ng4wopn8asn4m…e/blob/master/license.txt Source Code (7 lines) We can all see the line "Code changes are prohibited and it is strictly for…

I agree with you @vld It’s more like a design error in my opinion. There are other things that logically thinking do not make sense, like having to do this excesive calls or what I mentioned in my last post. Things like this made me create a new API proposal (REST). But to be totally honest, this is not a priority and if it’s going to change some day, it will take a long time until we see results.

3.png ES: - Compara planetas entre alianzas - Selecciona todo/ Marcar todo - Selecciona todo/ Desmarcar todo - Anadir inactivo - Eliminar inactivo

@vld Agree with you. You can see more details here Should /universes.xml be changed? At the same time, keep in mind you can use: - s40-it.ogame.gameforge.com/api/universes.xml - bellatrix-it.ogame.gameforge.com/api/universes.xml

Agree with @TGWo Maybe in the future we could add something similar to WoW (worldofwarcraft.com/en-us/news…-the-legion-companion-app) Of course OGame related, but the idea would be to help in automatization of some tasks, but of course not be an attack-bot. Would that still be helpful or provide a better gaming experience @Cyberbot2 @Bl4cky?

Quote from Trade Moonshot: “Quote from Charlie: “What about defenses? I thought that was more than enough to protect a moon, especially if it’s > 8.800km From one side I like the fact of encourage being out of vm. But then it makes really hard to drop moons and more rips would be needed. The way I see this viable is to avoid big “whales” players throwing rips to every moon without even knowing where the fleet is ” With relocation a moon can be taken down in less than 8 hours, 1-2 hours in speed …

What about defenses? I thought that was more than enough to protect a moon, especially if it’s > 8.800km From one side I like the fact of encourage being out of vm. But then it makes really hard to drop moons and more rips would be needed. The way I see this viable is to avoid big “whales” players throwing rips to every moon without even knowing where the fleet is

I see your point. The main problem of this types of changes is that as the ships and defenses are always the same (1 new ship - battlecruiser - in 10 years more or less), it's hard to keep everything balanced. If Ion Cannon gets an update, sure it will change the mechanics, what's fine, but at the same time will make other defenses a little bit useless and other maybe too expensive in comparison with the new Ion. I do not say your change is bad, I actually agree with you even that I do not use d…