Search Results
Search results 61-77 of 77.
-
For say the quick response and something short, other then being something new, I'd just say 50-50 otherwise. So say, least the continued worth of feedback seems reasonable even if say the idea doesn't change afterwards. Something might sum up till then for say a different "total". Otherwise I'm stuck on say the Star Trek: The Next Generation Theme Song and the Words in some sorts of, "This is Cargo Mid-shipman, in my log is the information for cargo distribution. Despite any place left to go is…
-
Well, with me trying to say find efforts to Reduce, Reuse, and say Recycle Posts when I made, I'm sure still somehow this Forum can get enough threads for a Page 2 Listing for such. I'd like to begin to say as such for, we should say have a vote for least a new thread to start with that is within subject and topic matters. As to what that thread could be I would say.. If you was going to post Spam what would it be?? I think a thread as such would be a great start for such if any haven't been fou…
-
Well, if cancelling still stops Idling costs, but yet charges you still for the cost of the return trip, then for not having costs between given that is what is not used to get to your destination would seem reasonable. Which again though to me seems like what is backwards, but to say reduce calculation costs seems reasonable. And since Idling for Orbit has no definite amount of time, then it's worth of cost is say as placed, rather intently or not. But say still without, for my corrective from …
-
Idling deuterium disappears once cancelled for essentially no Arrival for Idling of Fleet to sustain Idle Costs makes kinda some sense. But rather say they have the same return cost for destination travel still say for the slightly shorter trip back, I don't know on that one. Makes some sense but not at all times. But say least the A-B worth of a total distance, than rather A-B-A seems likely to still be able to pull off though. Given, going half-way there and back would be worth the initial say…
-
Once per player would seem defaultive to say in its' nature, probably leaving perhaps to the limitation of the quantified worth of say the Universe Functioning Operative, which if based on say efficiency say over effectiveness, probably would conflict to the standard of say the implied. Where were as say for a Customizable Solution, could rely just on input for say output, rather than just single input. But as such even for a Single Wonder, would debate say interest of limit per player. But say …
-
Yea, but at a time wouldn't real question be if Solar Satellites gain bonus, why doesn't Solar Plant?? By the time you get to Inner Lines for the difference, the contrast of cost for non-nerfing isn't as sustainable but for the shear worth of expense, which would say for the cost not be able to exceed interest of outcome. Even with more Solar Plants, Satellites could possible still be needed for an interest of offset for what is still provided for the of Fusions Plants, rather via Research in Ad…
-
We do need...
Post, This without the thumbs down and having a smiley instead of frown/slight frown kinda lip work might do as well for such. Sarcastic gestures to say at a time are kinda hard to come by, but Sarcasm is usually found offensive though too. , this two still gotta be the best ones to use say when used from, but to say on still, 50-50. Say for counter-contrast-retro-control variable-factor-difference, Say say for approved or disapproved. (Should say thumb(s) up or thumb(s) down, but contrast is varia…
-
As for Planet Fields for Planetary Developments rather then interests for Development for Planetary Concerns, not such if really was for the latter, but probably still as well off. But still even then, say having one Field additional than otherwise, could perhaps offer fair amount of advantages against say the difference, but perhaps more than likely as of course would not. But Wonder of the Universe to me would say like used as posted, something that everyone could participate of but like at th…
-
As long a say Transport was still a viable option of use as is for what is now of for is as to say, then perhaps could work. I would say though in Trader would be a start of this as such, and say using on Planet to Planet say otherwise, would seem to question the worth alot of being short on the other end. To me would always be the interest of say request or accept to say of the trade more than request for the time, but would seem then the other person would still always need to be on the other …
-
Without spending say a whole day for compare and contrast to all posts so far, which is kinda strange for the social/communication breakdown. I will say this so far and try to work out the difference later.. The direction of probably all interest and say even intent is probably the only direction to have. Despite what is mentioned within, now for what, why, how, when, which, and any further of as such, I don't know, my best guess would be what is called: Forums, Discussion Boards, Guides, Manual…
-
Perhaps an interest of option say in Settings to have for disable and enable of the videos could regarded to have or not initially in rather what videos say least to have. That way perhaps could include the already placed videos that are around available to use also as well, but might include say intro/-outro thoughts of individual videos against the rest though, but given the rest/one are not there. Thanks, Kellogen
-
I would agree that the current factor is kinda unbalanced, but still a good idea to have of though. Perhaps could be placed for an interest to employ new ideas and/or suggestions to be used as well, rather for first implementation and/or only use acquiring. And still maintain say base value gains for percentages and/or amounts for the day. Especially in regards to resources, but still leave things like power and Dark Matter be optional for use and still reasonable. Also the prospect of ships gai…
-
Think is a fairly good idea with a good solid base say for its' holdings, and if perhaps there much to change not much at all really. Don't get me wrong, I would like to add to this idea, but of an idea without even further to add, this is still a good one. Reduced Deuterium Costs in regards to Fleet Movements is probably what I would think last of really. And for the worth of Honor Points would even seem to perhaps say at a time put in within a means of high end Research with of cost for the Re…