Search Results

Any list for translation to for example Norwegian?

Info : Automatic conversion of Combat Report This one doesn't work at my .no acc. Does it have to be translated into Norwegian?

Sort out combat reports by time AND cords You can for example sort emails by date, topic or whatever. How about a button so you can sort by cords ( and off course time, as it is to day). Then it would be much easier to keep track of how many attacks you have had on a particular planet during the 24 hours period for bashing. I know this kind of function has been available for some time (years) in other GF games - like BiteFight for example.

As a Fleeter, I would just have LOVED this ship, but I agree with Azgaroth. Another question, beside loading the IPM and firering them - where do you keep the IPM, when you're not in the air? In the Missile silo? Then it still comes down to the silo capasity, and then you mostly only need 1 of these, maybe to - if it can carry 50 IPMs. Or is it so that you can build IPM for the silo AND for the ships, saying you have 50 of these ships, you can have 50x 50 + silo capasity? Even though I love the …

You can NOT delete the (I) acc with DM. People have paid rl money for it, so that's not an obsion. People can be inactive for all kind of reasons - with or without v.mode, too - but when they have paid rl money, the acc has to stay. And since they HAVE paid rl money - the acc should also produce ress. Those without DM gets deleted after 5 weeks anyway, so.... If you start deleting acc with DM after 5 weeks, I KNOW there will be a lot of angry people. Of course mostly those that are in v.mode.

Quote from restlesz: “100% would be good, but 50% would be okay, too. Then at least it has a meaning/purpose to be there.” That's what I would like, but I'm not the one to deside that. Quote from Red-Dragon: “People can stop because they know that it is possible to raid them. For higher players it doesn't matter but, for lower players it does. ” They can be raided whether they are atcive, (i) or (I), so I'm sorry, I don't understand why people would stop playing because they might get raided, if…

You can for example sort emails by date, topic or whatever. How about a button so you can sort by cords ( and off course time, as it is to day). Then it would be much easier to keep track of how many attacks you have had on a particular planet during the 24 hours period for bashing.

It might benefit you, Azgaroth, if you ever start up a new acc But I agree with you. I will not raid for 20k, when I have a xx mill acc. So yes, marshen, you might very well be the only one that would raid for that amount, since nobody I know, would raid for that amount, either, when the acc has passed x mill points. But if you are that active and spend your time probing and raiding for 20k, shouldn't you then be allowed to increase that much more, than thouse, that's not that active? No matter …

No, don't like the idea. It has to be my own choise to show my combat reports. As Marv said, it has also something to do with tactic. I am one of those, that doesn't post my combats, when it's a new uni. I also play under another nick, that my usual nick. Later on, I post of course, but at the forum - and under my usual nick. Why I do this? So nobody knows it's me, and therefor attack me, so I for example, can ninja. I've played two of my acc from new acc to # 1 ( the newest acc had 3 mill point…

No, don't like the idea. It has to be my own choise to show my combat reports. As Marv said, it has also something to do with tactic. I am one of those, that doesn't post my combats, when it's a new uni. I also play under another nick, that my usual nick. Later on, I post of course, but at the forum - and under my usual nick. Why I do this? So nobody knows it's me, and therefor attack me, so I for example, can ninja. I've played two of my acc from new acc to # 1 ( the newest acc had 3 mill point…

Quote from Red-Dragon: “The idea is to open up the inactive players(with dm) for rescources ?: bad idea. Because, playeracocunts will not deleted with dm. So that players always can return on their account. If you change this, then more players going to stop.” I don't really understand what you say here... Is there any reason that they can't returrn to their acc, if the acc produces ress, also after the 5 weeks of normal inactivity? Nobody has said anything about DELETING the acc. For sure, the …

24 hours for speed unis is fine by me. In normal 1x speed unis, you can take a farely long fleetsave without flying serveral galaxies, if you want to take some time off ... to party for example. That is almost impossible in speed unies if you have "more than a few cargoes" due to the cost of deut, because you have to fly xxx-gal to make the time. So no, I don't like the idea of 48 hours in speed unies. (and i don't like 12 hours either)

Don't quite understand your first suggestion, but the second one... Don't like it, as it is said there. That meens that you don't get moonchance if you're crashed. You can then loose a xxx million points of fleet wothout any chance of a moon? Nope, don't like. But to put up a new mission, so people can make ms on them self... yeah... that could be fare, but no research needed. It cost a lot to get a moon anyway. If a new mission should appear, then players without allys - or friends can still tr…

well, Since I agree with (I) produces ress, I just put out this [Suggestion] Inactive players (I)

I do see your point. I hope you're right that fusion will happen eash time too many players goes long-time inactive. That would help the problem, off course. But then again - with a prodution of 50% ( or maybe just 25%) I really don't think that high ranked player bother attacting those long-time (with DM) accs. But I could be wrong, off course. I just know that even though I have been playing in unis with ... 400 accs i total, I didn't bother raiding a LTI player for 12k metal, 6 k crystal and …

I wasn't thinking only in the test uni, but in general. They are - after 5 weeks - useless for both the players and for GF, and takes up space ( if it's a popular uni, that can be a problem, then) But yeah, due to the problems with highscore.......

well, in v-mode they will still take up space... And still be useless. Maybe it can be done, so it's only people in the first part of the noob protection that can raid them. It will help new accs.

If there's bought DM in an acc, when it goes inactive, it doesn't get deleted. So why not make it a bit usefull, since it takes up space anyway. Let it produce ress after the 5 weeks - 100% would be good, but 50% would be okay, too. Then at least it has a meaning/purpose to be there.

(Hidden Content)[i][/i]

Vi er på utkikk etter aktive for OGame tool utviklere! Er du utvikler av ett for OGame Tool og ønsker å dele dine kunnskaper og erfaringer med andre? Føler du deg dårlig informert om kommende for OGame versjoner, og hvordan disse kan kreve justeringer i ditt tool? Hvis du sa "ja", så bli med i vårt for OGame developer community! Der vil du finne utviklerne av alle de store for OGame Tool, for eksempel COGame. Som en del av teamet vårt kan du utveksle kode, diskutere ideer og selv adressere feil …