Search Results

I think its better to only give it each 2 levels AFTER the level 15. If each new account receives a free relocation, you will see a lot of creation of new accounts just to relocate in a system to lock it.

It can be every two levels AFTER the level 15, for instance. It represents only 3 free relocations (level 17, 19, 21) for average astrophysicians.

It depends. If the main purpose is to receive players that are interested to meet some foreign players, or to represent their own country in a tournament, a X1 is a really good idea. If the main purpose is to receive hardcore players, a X5 is better. However, I think that in Origin, you cannot choose your interface language, everyone has the game in English; its a kind of thing to change to have a lot of players.

Quote from Danimanza: “No, it doesn't involve several players (just 1). In this suggest you can break the pushing rule with another players, as long as you don't send transport missions or illegal battles, just system gives you a way to transfer resources from "Account B" to "Account A".” The Scrap feature allows to create mountains of res on an account (for example with a big defense), and the merchant allows to transfer everything from this account to another.

Exactly like the Scrap feature and nobody makes anything against that...

Quote from Rdet: “Just like the other ways of pushing we will have to prove it within the limits of the AT.” Its the problem : it is not recognized as a push. So you cannot apply the "other ways of pushing"...

Hello, No reactions from authorities ? Valent, you know that your solution is not applicable for that Guys, I'm not the only one, operators, admins, and also some CoMa are complaining, or are conscient of the problem... Is it possible to find a solution directly in the game ?

Quote from Valent: “ Players will always try to find ways around the rules, "to cheat the system". If we continue with making restrictions we can end up playing x/o. It is part of their idea of game, and is the game staff's job to keep them under control. That is my opinion, you block this possibility ( no idea how it can be done), always will exist some players finding a new way to go around the rules and get profit out of it . I don't say cheaters should not be punished, but we can't punish ev…

Quote from Valent: “playing two accounts in the same universe is against the rules” Don't play with words... You know that the action is made either by the same player with some precautions, or by two different players; but one of them has just as role to scrap and transfer, and not to play the account...

Its the main point of the problem : the succession of actions have exactly the same consequences of a very big push, but each action taken separately are legal. We are searching since a very long time about ways to prevent this, but the only answer we have is "its legal". But the consequences are dramatic on the motivation and involvement of other players in the game. Finally : why do you think that this idea is a "restriction" ?

I think Ogame has all interest to react very fastly against the abuses encountered with the new functionnality "Scrap Merchant". I don't know on other communities, but in France several players are growing incredibly just by recovering passwords of given up accounts with defences or fleets; they scrap all the destroyable units, converts everything in deut for example, and trade the res through their main accounts. Result (with Merchant conversions) : all the scrapped res of an account appear "ju…

I think that the easier is to have the same scheeme on every part of the game ! Such in Galaxy, in spy reports, in team page, in statistics, etc... if inactive > grey; if active and : vacation > blue honorable / bandit > yellow outlaw > purple operator or assimilated > orange if the code always call the same function to "display" the name of a player, it could be easy

EDIT : Sorry, mistake.

Did you receive any answer for that ?

This can be moved as implemented no ?

Any fix of this ? Or show players in vacation mode in blue, and players in vacation mode + i in grey as today ?

I think this suggestion has been forgotten... Any news ?

Quote from JoKy: “It´s forbidden by law to delete accounts, where someone still has some, bought by real money, premium stuff in it. I have an online account in another german service, where i have 1 euro cent in it. It´s there since 12 years and can´t be deleted by the hoster.” Blablabla. Several accounts have been lost during the merge in the French community; not yet (and I suppose never) restored. Two monthes ago an account with bought-DM disapparead itself. No news. And I don't see the GF's…

I repeat my suggestion on all topic trying to manage this problem : Today we have : "the i35+ accounts without bought DM will be erased." Tomorrow we could have : "the i35+ accounts without bought DM will be erased. All other i35+ accounts will loose 1k AM by day." No, I don't want to introduce a new paid service : you just have to connect yourself monthly to avoid to pay for securing your account...

Merges are not announced by a Lambda User, but by an Ogame Tech or by Francolino...